Saturday, July 4, 2009
News and Information

Latest NewsLegal DefinitionsSeminars & PublicationsClients

If you think that you may have a case, call us at (916) 351-1200 or fill out the form below

Latest News

Latest News

Miller Law, Inc.

Trial Lawyers

Construction Litigation • Toxic Mold • Real Estate • Insurance • Landlord/Tenant

Confidence • Integrity • Results

News

Construction

[07/02] As deficit grows, Calif. prepares to issue IOUs
[07/01] Knoll, Inc. to Announce Second Quarter 2009 Results
[07/01] BrassCraft 100% Compliant Plumbing Products Are Now Available for 2010 Legislation

More...

Environment

[07/01] Protection sought again for giant, spitting worms
[07/01] Scientists lower Alaska volcano threat level
[07/01] Enraged elephant stomps 3 Thai workers to death

More...

Real Estate

[07/01] Florida's Climate Is Business-Friendly, Says Florida Association of Realtors(R)
[07/01] Kristi Hirota-Schmidt Honored as One of PBN's 'Forty Under 40'
[07/01] Rep. Dennis Cardoza Joins FHLBank San Francisco for a Habitat for Humanity Build Day at Hope Village

More...

Insurance

[07/02] Aon Announces Second Quarter 2009 Earnings Release and Conference Call
[07/02] Battle of the Sexes Boosts Kwik Fit Insurance Sales
[07/02] Devilfish.com Launches Revolutionary Online Casino Insurance

More...

Case Summaries

Contracts

[07/02] Marilyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GBMH & Co.
In a trademark infringement action involving the enzyme-based dietary supplement Wobenzym, the District Court's preliminary injunction requiring Defendant to cease selling a dietary supplement is affirmed in part, where Defendant did not meet its burden to prove that Plaintiff ceased production of the supplement; but vacated in part, where a District Court must find a substantial risk of danger to the public or other special circumstances in order to enter an interlocutory order recalling a product in a trademark infringement case.

[07/01] Bristol West Ins. Co. v. Wawanesa Mutual Ins. Co.
In a dispute involving the interpretation of an insurance contract, district court judgment is reversed where the plain language of the Out of State Coverage clause in the policy makes specific reference to any accident that occurs out of state, and does not focus on the limits of the out of the state financial responsibility law, and thus the insurance policy necessarily expands the amount of liability coverage in this case since the accident occurred in New Brunswick.

[07/01] Mesa Air Group, Inc. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
In an action seeking an injunction prohibiting Defendant airline from terminating its regional connection agreement with Plaintiff airline, an injunction in favor of Plaintiff is affirmed where Plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on its claim that Defendant was equitably estopped from terminating the agreement.

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

The attorneys of Miller Law, Inc., in Sacramento, California, represent clients from communities such asFolsom, Stockton, Napa, Vacaville, Elk Grove, Fairfield, Roseville, San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose, Fresno, Yuba City, Vallejo, Fremont, Hayward, Los Angeles, and Redding, in counties including Sacramento County, Solano County, San Joaquin County, Yolo County, Sutter County, El Dorado County, and Placer County. Also serving Nevada clients in communities such as Reno, Las Vegas, Lake Tahoe, and Carson City.