Wednesday, March 10, 2010
News and Information

Latest NewsLegal DefinitionsSeminars & PublicationsClients

If you think that you may have a case, call us at (888) 353-0285
(916) 458-0098
or fill out the form below

Latest News

Latest News

Miller Law, Inc.

Trial Lawyers

Construction Litigation • Toxic Mold • Real Estate • Insurance • Landlord/Tenant

Confidence • Integrity • Results

News

Construction

[03/09] China ACM to Present at the ROTH 22nd Annual OC Growth Stock Conference
[03/09] CRIC Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2009 Results
[03/09] Co. owner indicted in deadly NYC crane collapse

More...

Environment

[03/10] China tells US to do more on climate change
[03/09] US-born panda freed from quarantine in China
[03/09] Britain could force owners to microchip their dogs

More...

Real Estate

[03/09] E-House Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2009 Results and Declares Cash Dividend
[03/09] CRIC Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2009 Results
[03/08] Bairdwarner.com Offers Exclusive Online Search Engine for Investors & Prospective Buyers of Area Foreclosed Properties

More...

Insurance

[03/08] Chairmen Selected for Chinese Drywall Insurance Program
[03/08] ImmunoGen cancer drug gets 'orphan drug' status
[03/08] AIG sells Alico unit to MetLife for $15.5 billion

More...

Case Summaries

Contracts

[03/09] Seltzer v. Barnes
Trial court's denial of defendant's anti-SLAPP motion, arising from an underlying suit involving claims against a property management company and homeowners' association, is reversed where: 1) the trial court erred in concluding plaintiff's two causes of action against defendant do not arise from speech or petitioning activity where his alleged conduct was the negotiation of a settlement in the prior case; and 2) because defendant may not be held liable for the alleged conduct under the litigation privilege, plaintiff has failed to show a probability of prevailing on her causes of action for fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

[03/09] San Francisco Hous. Auth. v. SEIU Local 790
Superior court's order vacating an arbitration award in its entirety on the ground that the the award is contrary to layoff provisions of the memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the parties is reversed as the remedy imposed by the arbitrator did not conflict with clear and explicit language of the MOU and it was rationally related to the breach identified.

[03/09] Hoopa Valley Tribe v. US
In an action against the United States for breach of fiduciary duty brought by the Hoopa Valley Tribe, arising from the distribution of the remainder in a Settlement Fund established under the Hoopa-Yurok Settlement Act only to the Yurok Tribe, summary judgment in favor of the government is vacated and remanded where: 1) the Hoopa Valley Tribe lacks standing because it cannot show an injury in fact; but 2) the matter should have been dismissed without prejudice

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

The attorneys of Miller Law, Inc., in Sacramento, California, represent clients from communities such asFolsom, Stockton, Napa, Vacaville, Elk Grove, Fairfield, Roseville, San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose, Fresno, Yuba City, Vallejo, Fremont, Hayward, Los Angeles, and Redding, in counties including Sacramento County, Solano County, San Joaquin County, Yolo County, Sutter County, El Dorado County, and Placer County. Also serving Nevada clients in communities such as Reno, Las Vegas, Lake Tahoe, and Carson City.